Army Chemical Review

SUMMER 2012

Army Chemical Review presents professional information about Chemical Corps functions related to chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, smoke, flame, and civil support operations.

Issue link: https://chemical.epubxp.com/i/68692

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 17 of 47

There was also a correlation between a Soldier's ASVAB Skilled Technical (ST) score and his or her test performance: 90 percent of the students who had ST scores of more than UHFHLYHG KD]PDW RSHUDWLRQV FHUWL¿cation, while 43 percent of the students who had ST scores of less than 100 became KD]PDW RSHUDWLRQV FHUWL¿HG 5 The hazmat technician evaluation was split into two tests— 7HFKQLFLDQ , DQG 7HFKQLFLDQ ,, 7R EHFRPH KD]PDW WHFKQLFLDQ FHUWL¿HG LQGLYLGXDOV PXVW SDVV WKH hazmat awareness and KD]PDW RSHUDWLRQV WHVWV ZLWK VFRUHV RI SHUFHQW RU JUHDWHU 6HH )LJXUH ,Q WKH $,7 SLORW FRXUVH EHFDPH KD]PDW WHFKQLFLDQ FHUWLILHG VXFFHVVIXOO\ WUDLQHG DQG SHUFHQW RI WKH VWXGHQWV SHUFHQW ZHUH SHUFHQW IDLOHG $JDLQ WHVW UH- sults showed a correlation with students' GT scores: 86 per- cent of the students who had GT scores of more than 105 EHFDPH KD]PDW WHFKQLFLDQ FHUWL¿HG ZKLOH QRQH RI WKHP failed; only 17 percent of the students who had GT scores of OHVV WKDQ EHFDPH FHUWL¿HG DQG SHrcent of the Soldiers who had GT scores of less than 100 failed the hazmat techni- FLDQ FHUWL¿FDWLRQ WHVW And, again, there was a correlation between a Soldier's ASVAB ST score and his or her test performance: All students who had ST scores of 100 or more were successfully trained— DQG SHUFHQW RI WKHP UHFHLYHG KD]PDW WHFKQLFLDQ FHUWL¿FD- tion; 25 percent of the students who had ST scores of less than IDLOHG WKH KD]PDW WHFKQLFLDQ WHVW These analyses have led to the conclusion that more analyses are required before hazmat operations and hazmat technician FHUWLILFDWLRQ FDQ EH IXOO\ LPSOHPHQWHG LQ WKH $,7 FODVV The next AIT class scheduled to conduct hazmat operations FHUWL¿FDWLRQ LV WR EH KHOG LQ -XQH $GMXVWPHQWV ZLOO EH made in an attempt to improve the success rate of trained and FHUWL¿HG VWXGHQWV DQG UHVRXUFHV ZLOO EH RUJDQL]HG WR H[HFXWH WKLV WUDLQLQJ IRU DERXW &%51 $,7 VWXGHQWV HDFK \HDU The inclusion of this training represents an increase in USA- CBRNS hazmat operations training of about 46 percent, which UHTXLUHV DGGLWLRQDO FHUWL¿HG LQVWUXFWRUV QXUVLQJ VXSSRUW FRVWO\ equipment, maintenance support, and compliance (testing and TXDOLW\ DVVXUDQFH SHUVRQQHO Module F: Radiological Operations The Radiological Operations module carried CBRN Soldier WUDLQLQJ LQWR WKH VW FHQWXU\ 6WXGHQWV ZHUH LQWURGXFHG WR radiological dispersion devices, high-frequency radio and ODVHU KD]DUGV DQG OHVVRQV OHDUQHG IURP 2SHUDWLRQ 7RPRGDFKL The radiological laboratory team introduced students to radiological dispersion devices—the most likely near-term UDGLRORJLFDO WHUURULVW WKUHDW 5DGLRORJLFDO GLVSHUVLRQ GHYLFHV are explosive devices that are capable of spreading radiologi- cally contaminated material throughout an area, causing fear DQG FUHDWLQJ D GHWHFWLRQ DQG GHFRQWDPLQDWLRQ FKDOOHQJH 7KH use of live sources and an increase in hands-on training with UDGLDWLRQ GHWHFWLRQ HTXLSPHQW ERRVWHG 6ROGLHUV¶ FRQ¿GHQFH LQ WKHLU DELOLW\ WR LGHQWLI\ DQG PLWLJDWH UDGLRORJLFDO WKUHDWV )LJXUH +D]PDW WHFKQLFLDQ FHUWL¿FDWLRQ E\ *7 VFRUH 16 Army Chemical Review

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Army Chemical Review - SUMMER 2012